Neutrality is structural, not policy.
Written by one side. Visible to both. Owned by neither.
We always
Record, never decide.
Keep both parties equal.
Remove the need to trust us.
Stay policy-agnostic.
Decouple revenue from outcomes.
We never
Arbitrate.
Score, rank, or meter.
Act as an identity layer.
Repurpose records for monitoring.
Act as an auditor.
The provider pays PacSpace. How is that neutral? Because neutrality was never about who pays. It is about who can modify the record, and who can read it without permission. Nobody can modify it. Both sides can read it. Payment buys the recording; it buys no influence over what the record says. A notary paid by the signer is still a notary: the notary commits the signing, it does not judge the contract.
Neutrality is structural. It comes from how the record is held: the same for both sides, readable by each, and produced the same way no matter who is asking. Same inputs, same math, same result.
A policy is a promise. Structure is a property. Promises drift; properties hold. Once committed, the record reads the same for both sides, either side can open it without asking, and no change can happen without both sides seeing. The scope commitments stay kept because nothing pays for breaking them: revenue is decoupled from outcomes, so PacSpace has no stake in what any record shows.